I came across a short speech that AOC gave on the House Floor this week in support of Tibetan freedom from China, and it reminded me of the speeches American politicians gave back in the 1970s and 1980s in support of Jewish liberation from the Soviet Union.
So I decided to do a quick mashup for comparison: AOC vs Jack Kemp.
Kemp was a New York Congressman, supply-sider, and an anticommunist who played a not-so-small role in the weaponization of Jews for America’s long war against the Soviet Union. Here he is giving a speech at the “Freedom Rally for Soviet Jews” in December 1987, where supposedly 200,000 people gathered to denounce communist barbarism — an event that had a live band and was headlined by Vice President (and former head of the CIA) George Bush himself.
Watching the two side-by-side, I gotta say that Jack Kemp does a much better job. Even though AOC clearly feels the need to play to her weaponized immigrant base, she just does not seem to have her heart in it. And I guess that’s a good thing — maybe she’s reluctant to take part in the US tradition of cynically and selectively using human rights concerns as a tool of empire. But I don’t want to be too optimistic here.
I mean, she did comically vote (along with Tom Cotton and Marco Rubio) for a law that would deploy earthly American sanctions to meddle in the heavenly reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. No joke!
“I was also proud to vote in support of the Tibet Policy and Support Act of 2019, which would establish as U.S. policy that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama is a religious matter that should be decided solely by Tibetan Buddhists; specify that Chinese officials who interfere in the Dalai Lama’s succession process will be subject to Global Magnitsky sanctions; mandate that China cannot establish any new consulates in the U.S. until a U.S. consulate is established in Tibet; and authorize State Department programs for Tibetan cultural and environmental conservation,” she wrote in a statement released on the birthday of the Dalai Lama, a rent-a-saint who’ll work with and bless anyone — be they pathetic sex cults or oligarchic death lobbies — for a bit of cash.
The United States is a nation of weaponized immigrants. And so for AOC — like for many other politicians — domestic politics flow naturally into international politics. Is there really a line? The important questions is: What are AOC’s international politics?
—Yasha Levine
Want to know more more? Read my series about forced Jewish migration to Israel:
Part Two: Soviet Jews and a Zionist Population Transfer Dream Deferred
Part Three: Zionists, Palestinian kidnappers, and the forced migration of Soviet Jews to Israel.
There are also a few bonus installments:
"The important questions is: What are AOC’s international politics?"
Probably the same as any 'rising star' within the Red and Blue factions of the War Party.
https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/AOC-Refuses-To-Condemn-Venezuela-Coup-20190504-0029.html
Semi-on-topic:
The more I read about American foreign policy and corporate capitalism American-style, the more obvious it is that we're fucked, or at least our kids and grandkids are, unless as a very first step some sort of re-calculation of what it means to be a functioning society with the welfare of everyone in mind, we finally implement a form of M4A in the next 5-10 years. Corporate capitalism kills, and it completely controls our government (and destroys our environment and defines our immigration and foreign policies).
The limits of acceptable discourse, including policy discourse among our elected representatives haven't been narrower since the height of the Cold War and Red Scare. Came pretty close in the run-up to Iraq Part Deux, but at this point ANY politician for either mainstream party and ANY journalist for any of the mainstream corporate media outlets knows what they can and can't write or say, privately (Twitter, etc.) or as part of their reportage at work. This is why Substack is under constant attack now from the mainstream.
AOC is a clever, pleasant face with a few "radical" policy ideas that will likely never happen as she climbs the ladder and is forced to embrace the narrative.
Where's the comment icon for the Omidyar Part One?
Please don't spell hippie as 'hippy' anymore. It ain't so. And I know.